Winterhalter Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:12 pm
FWIW, while I think Noah's criticisms about lack of focus are valid, I think this deck might be better in practice than you guys are giving it credit for. At the very beginning of last extended season, there was a fae deck that was pretty successful predicated on maximizing Chrome Mox by making powerful turn 2 plays (Bob, Blossom) on turn 1. These plays both recoup card advantage long term, so the short term loss from the Mox is offset. The use of Thirst also helps filter through the large number of bad late game draws, e.g. Mox and redundant Bossoms, thereby offsetting the usual weaknesses of fae (draw a bunch of random Visions and Blossoms late). Plus Thirst's usual synergy with Sword of the Meek.
The question is whether the Thopter combo is value-added compared to the usual faeries cards that would occupy these slots (Mistbind Clique, for example). I don't think it's that easy to assess that at-a-glance like you guys are doing here. This is why I was hoping Wesley would comment, since he tried this and then moved away from it.
In other words, while lack of focus is a valid critique and a genuine problem, it doesn't mean the deck is bad. Most decks have some intrinsic problems like this, including the opposite extreme, hyperfocus (U/G Scapeshift comes to mind here). Zoo is good in part because it doesn't seem to suffer from this kind of thing very much (all the cards are redundant, and efficient creatures + burn is a valid strategy vs. just about everything).